• Users Online: 969
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Abstracting and Indexing Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 260-264

Evaluation of changes in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and aberrations in patients with keratoconus after corneal collagen cross-linking


Eye Research center, Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Date of Submission20-Feb-2016
Date of Acceptance05-Dec-2016
Date of Web Publication13-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
MD Amirhosein Vejdani
Eye Research center, Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9176794454
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_30_16

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Purpose: To assess and compare preoperative refractive, aberrometric, topographic, and contrast sensitivity (CS) measurements with postoperative values after corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.
Methods: Twenty-two eyes of 11 patients with keratoconus were enrolled in this prospective study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), CS, and higher order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after surgery.
Results: The mean total HOAs of the included patients were 2.24, 2.34, 2.28, 2.17, and 2.03 μm before and 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after CXL, respectively. A significant reduction in corneal HOAs including vertical coma, vertical and horizontal trefoil and spherical aberration was observed 6 and 8 months after CXL.UDVA and BSCVA improved significantly in all patients who completed the follow-up period (P = 0.001). Although mean cS declined significantly 1 month postoperatively, it improved significantly after 3, 6, and 8 months (P<0.001). Maximum keratometry was significantly lower 8 months postoperatively compared to the preoperative value. (P = 0.006).
Conclusions: CXL seems to improve UCVA, BSCVA, and CS and reduce most corneal HOAs in progressive forms of keratoconus.

Keywords: Collagen Cross-linking; Contrast Sensitivity; Corneal Aberration; Keratoconus


How to cite this article:
Zarei-Ghanavati S, Khakshour H, Vejdani M, Ghooshkhanei H, Vejdani A. Evaluation of changes in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and aberrations in patients with keratoconus after corneal collagen cross-linking. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2017;12:260-4

How to cite this URL:
Zarei-Ghanavati S, Khakshour H, Vejdani M, Ghooshkhanei H, Vejdani A. Evaluation of changes in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and aberrations in patients with keratoconus after corneal collagen cross-linking. J Ophthalmic Vis Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Aug 22];12:260-4. Available from: http://www.jovr.org/text.asp?2017/12/3/260/210626


  Introduction Top


Keratoconus is a progressive, bilateral, asymmetric, non-inflammatory, degenerative disease that leads to central or inferotemporal thinning of the cornea. It may also occur in the superior region of the cornea. It is the most common cause of corneal ectasia. The conical shape of the cornea causes high myopia and irregular astigmatism and interferes with visual function. The disease usually appears in the second decade of life during puberty and usually progresses until the fourth decade of life.[1],[2],[3],[4] The prevalence of keratoconus is 5 to 23 per 10,000, and the incidence is 4.5 per 10,000.[2],[3],[5] Different studies report different rates which is due to diversity in the descriptive or diagnostic criteria in various studies.[4],[5] The disease affects all races; it is more common in women in some studies and in men in others.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] Ocular signs and symptoms of keratoconus may vary according to the severity of the disease. Disease progression results in severe irreversible loss of visual acuity. The emergence of “scissors-like” reflex in retinoscopy is an indication of irregular astigmatism. In cases of moderate and advanced keratoconus, circular arc deposition of hemosiderin (Fleischer's ring) is often evident. Iron accumulation results from extreme change of corneal curvature.[10] Munson's sign and Rizzuti's sign are often observed in advanced stages, and Descemet's membrane rupture in severe keratoconus causes sudden loss of vision and significant pain.[11] Increased high order aberrations are another problem of keratoconus which can lead to impaired visual acuity.[12],[13]

Keratoconus treatment depends on the severity of the disease. Patients in early stages can wear glasses. Patients with mild to moderate keratoconus can use hard contact lens, and patients with severe form of the disease may need corneal transplantation.

The CXL technique involves formation of covalent cross-links between collagen fibrils. This method uses a photosensitive material, riboflavin, and a specific wavelength of ultraviolet irradiation, to increase the biomechanical stability of the cornea.[14] The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of CXL on refractive and aberrometric measurements and contrast sensitivity in patients with progressive keratoconus.


  Methods Top


Study Subjects

This study enrolled 22 eyes of 11 patients with keratoconus. All patients provided informed consent and the study which followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki was approved by the Ethics committee of our university. The inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical or subclinical keratoconus (clinical signs and abnormal retinoscopy reflex), clear cornea without central opacity, thinnest corneal thickness >400 μm, and corneal mean keratometry of less than 58 diopters (D). Patients older than 30 years of age, patients who failed to attend the follow-up examinations until 6 months postoperatively or longer, and pregnant and nursing patients were excluded.

Study Measurements

Complete preoperative ophthalmic evaluations were conducted for all patients. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were measured using logarithmic scale charts (Lighthouse International, New York, NY, USA). BSCVA (CDVA) was measured using trial frames at a distance of 6 m from the chart box. Auto Kerato-Refractometer KR-1/RM-1(Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., Oakland, CA, USA) was used to measure manifest and cycloplegic refraction and keratometry. A CSV-1000 contrast (CS) sensitivity test was conducted. Total wavefront analysis was performed with a Pentacam (Pentacam ® HR, Type 70900, OCULUS, Wetzelar, Germany). The device measures mean total corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), mean vertical and horizontal coma, and trefoil and mean corneal spherical aberration. All parameters were evaluated before and 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after surgery.

Cross-linking Surgery

All patients underwent standard CXL under sterile conditions in the operating room. Topical anesthesia of 0.05% tetracain eye drops was administered. Epithelium removal of an area 7-9 mm in diameter was done using a no. 15 surgical knife (Swann- Morton, Sheffield, England). In addition, a solution of 0.1% riboflavin (Biotech Visioncare) in 20% dextran (T500) (10 mg riboflavin in 0.1 mL dextran) was applied every 2-3 min. After 30 min, the patient was examined using a slit lamp with a cobalt blue filter for the presence of fluorescein in the anterior chamber. The cornea was then irradiated with calibrated UV-A light with a wavelength of 370 nm and an irradiance of 3 mW/cm 2 for 30 minutes. During irradiation, riboflavin drops were applied to the cornea every 2 minutes to sustain the required concentration of riboflavin and to prevent desiccation of the cornea. Postoperatively, the patient received topical chloramphenicol (Clobiotic 0.5% ophthalmic drops, Sina Darou, Tehran, Iran) and betamethasone (Betasonate 0.1% ophthalmic drops, Sina Darou, Tehran, Iran). A bandage contact lens (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA, USA) was fitted until reepithelialization was complete (usually after 3 days). The patient was followed up on consecutive days after surgery until contact lens removal. chloramphenicol and betamethasone 0.1% eye drops were administered 4 times per day during the first week. Betamethasone was replaced in the second week with fluorometholone 4 times per day.

After 7 days, the dose was tapered over 4-6 weeks. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after surgery.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the statistical software PASS 11 (NCSS, LLC., Kaysville, UT, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


  Results Top


Twenty-two eyes of 11 patients were included in the study and followed up for 8 months postoperatively. No postoperative complications were observed.

Visual Acuity changes

[Table 1] shows the postoperative effects of CXL on UCVA and BSCVA. After 8 months, the mean UCVA improved significantly compared to preoperative measurements, from 0.72 ± 0.027 to 0.53 ± 0.023 logMAR (P = 0.001). Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.26 ± 0.029 logMAR. One month after CXL, it was 0.23 ± 0.015 logMAR. At 3, 6, and 8 months, it was 0.18 ± 0.013, 0.17 ± 0.015, and 0.17 ± 0.014 logMAR, respectively. The changes were statistically significant over 8 months (P = 0.001).
Table 1. Visual acuity changes over time in eyes treated with cross-linking

Click here to view


Corneal Wavefront

The mean preoperative total HOA changed significantly, from 2.24 ± 0.57 μm to 2.33 ± 0.53 μm, 2.17 ± 0.53 μm, and 2.02 ± 0.54 μm, at 1, 6, and 8 months after CXL, respectively (P = 0.0078, P = 0.012, P = 0.001 respectively), but the difference at 3 months was not significant (P = 0.29). Analysis of the vertical coma revealed significant changes at all follow-up visits (P = 0.001), but horizontal coma changes were not significant. Significant changes were also observed for vertical and horizontal trefoils after 8 months (P = 0.001, P<0.001) [Table 2].
Table 2. Higher-order corneal aberrations compared before and after surgery

Click here to view


Mean corneal spherical aberrations decreased significantly, from 0.78 ± 0.37 μm preoperatively to 0.59 ± 0.35 μm 8 months after surgery (P = 0.001). The differences in mean values at all except the 3-month post-surgical follow-up were statistically significant [Table 2].

Contrast Sensitivity

The average preoperative CS for all patients was 1.46 ± 0.06 log CS, which decreased to 1.41 ± 0.07 log one month postoperatively and then increased to 1.62 ± 0.05 log at the final follow up examination. [Table 3] summarizes the CS data and demonstrates that there was no significant difference throughout the study period.
Table 3. contrast sensitivity before and after cross-linking in 22 eyes

Click here to view


Maximum Simulated Keratometry Value

The mean maximum simulated keratometry value (Kmax) before CXL was 52.5 D (47.25-54.5 D); it was 51.1 D (45.2-54 D) after 3 months and 49.5 D (47.2-51.15 D) after 6 months. Eight months after surgery, Kmax was 51.5 D (47.1-54.25 D) which was significantly lower than preoperative measurements (P = 0.006).


  Discussion Top


The primary goal of CXL is the stabilization of keratoconus. Astigmatism treatment, increase of visual acuity, and better vision quality are also the secondary goals.[15],[16] Our study identified statistically significant differences between the primary parameters obtained before and after CXL.

According to the UCVAs of the patients in this study, the accelerated downward trend decreased over time and the differences compared with previous months were statistically significant (P<0.001). UCVA changed from 0.72 preoperatively to 0.64, 0.55, 0.54, and 0.54 after 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after surgery, respectively. In this study, we found that BSCVA followed a pattern similar to that of UCVA. A statistically significant improvement was seen in this variable (P = 0.003) in the first month after cross-linking that was slower in subsequent months (0.24, 0.18, 0.17, and 0.17 in 1, 3, 6, and 8 months after surgery). These results are consistent with the results of previous similar studies.[15],[17],[18],[19],[20]

The effective factor to improve visual acuity after crosslinking is not clear. We don't know even if topographic examinations,[21] pachymetry,[22] corneal haziness,[23] or cornea biomechanics [24] after CXL are the clinical characteristics associated with visual acuity after treatment.

Some studies have shown a significant decrease in Kmax after CXL,[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30] and others reported stability in corneal keratometry.[31],[32] The patients in our study showed a significant decrease in Kmax after CXL, which reveals a flattening effect of this procedure.

Increased anterior corneal and posterior corneal HOAs are the factors responsible for decreased visual acuity in keratoconic eyes.[21],[33],[34],[35] cross-linking was first used to prevent progression of corneal ectasia, but was later found to be useful for visual acuity and improvement in corneal topographic characteristic in some patients.[16],[21],[35],[36],[37] In the present study, the total corneal HOA was observed to increase initially after surgery, but decreased at 6 and 8 months postoperatively. after surgery. A similar pattern of a significant increase in the first month followed by a significant decrease in the following months, especially in the sixth and eight months, was observed in other HOAs, including vertical coma (the most important Zernike coefficient affecting visual acuity), horizontal coma, vertical trefoil, horizontal trefoil, and spherical aberration. Among these measures, the horizontal coma followed this pattern, but none of the changes were statistically significant. Generally, results associated with HOA corresponded to the results of similar previous studies.[18],[38],[39] It indicated that after CXL, the corneal shape undergoes a process of regularization.

Contrast sensitivity is a valuable index in visual function.[40],[41] CS changes in cases of keratoconus after CXL have not been well studied. Even if the corrected visual acuity is optimal, contrast sensitivity may be reduced due to an increase in HOA in patients with keratoconus.[42],[43] In this study, the findings associated with contrast sensitivity also follow a pattern similar to that of HOA. compared to preoperative value, CS was significantly decrease at postoperative month 1. However, it increased significantly at postoperative months 3, 6, and 8. Lamy et al [44] found in their study of 68 keratoconic eyes that CS improved over 2 years of follow-up (P < 0.001) in contrast with control eyes, in which changes were not significant over time (P = 0.228). The Pelli-Robson test was used for CS measurements and compared to our study, the final CS after 2 years was higher (1.69 compared with 1.62 after 8 months in our study).

CXL can increase corneal rigidity up to 328.9%.[45] The improvement in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after CXL is the result of decreasing corneal curvature, astigmatism, and biomechanical stability.

The major limitations of this study were the small sample size and the recruitment of both eyes of a single patient and short follow-up duration. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required to better define the outcomes of CXL.

In conclusion, CXL is considered one of the most promising developments of recent decades for the treatment of keratoconus as it improves corneal HOAs, in particular coma, and contrast sensitivity. According to studies conducted to date, it seems that this method could potentially reduce morbidity from progressive forms of the disease and may ultimately reduce the need for corneal transplantation.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest

 
  References Top

1.
Nottingham J. Practical observations on conical cornea. London: churchill, London; 1984; p. 1-19.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:267-273.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297-319.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology 2004; 111:440-446.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related non-inflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984;28:293-322.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Stein HA, Stein RM, Freeman MI. The ophthalmic assistant: A text for allied and associated ophthalmic personnel. canada: Elsevier Mosby; 2006. p. 396.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Owens H, Gamble G. A profile of keratoconus in New Zealand. cornea 2003;22:122-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wagner H, Barr JT, Zadnik K. collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (cLEK) study: Methods and findings to date. contact Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:223-232.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Georgiou T, Funnell cL, cassels-Brown A, O'conor R. Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:379-383.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Weed KH, MacEwen cJ, Giles T, Low J, McGhee cN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: Demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:534-541.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ziaei H, Jafarinasab MR, Javadi MA, Karimian F, Poorsalman H, Mahdavi M, Shoja MR, Katibeh M. Epidemiology of keratoconus in an Iranian population. cornea 2012;31(9):1044-1047.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Mihashi T, Hirohara Y, Nishida K, et al. Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1996-2003.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland Hc, Tu EY, Starck T, Zayac EJ, et al. corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg 2000;16:507-514.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T. Endothelial cell damage after riboflavin-ultraviolet-a treatment in the rabbit. J cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1786-1790.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620-627.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: Long-term results. J cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:796-801.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 2009;116:369-378.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
coskunseven E, Jankov MR 2nd, Hafezi F. contralateral eye study of corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UVA irradiation in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009;25:371-376.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
caporossi A, Baiocchi S, Mazzotta c, Traversi c, caporossi T. Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin-ultraviolet type A rays induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: Preliminary refractive results in an Italian study. J cataract Refract Surg 200;32:837-845.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Wittig-Silva c, Whiting M, Lamoureux E, Lindsay RG, Sullivan LJ, Snibson GR. A randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: Preliminary results. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S720-S725.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results. J cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1282-1290.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results. J cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:691-700.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Bhatt J, Hersh PS. Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis. J cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:2105-2114.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. cornea 2012;31:21-25.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Elbaz U, Yeung SN, Ziai S, Lichtinger AD, Zauberman NA, Goldich Y, et al. collagen crosslinking after radial keratotomy. cornea 2014;33:131-136.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
chan Tc, chow VW, Jhanji V, Wong VW. Different topographic response between mild to moderate and advanced keratoconus after accelerated collagen cross-linking. cornea 2015;34:922-927.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Marino GK, Torricelli AA, Giacomin N, Santhiago MR, Espindola R, Netto MV. Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for postoperative LASIK ectasia: Two-Year Outcomes. J Refract Surg 2015;31:380-384.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ng AL, chan Tc, cheng Ac. conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus. clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;44:8-14.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shetty R, Pahuja NK, Nuijts RM, Ajani A, Jayadev c, Sharma c, Nagaraja H. current Protocols of corneal collagen cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:243-249.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rossi S, Orrico A, Santamaria c, Romano V, De Rosa L, Simonelli F, De Rosa G. Standard versus trans-epithelial collagen cross-linking in keratoconus patients suitable for standard collagen cross-linking. clin Ophthalmol 2015;18:9:503-509.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sherif AM. Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of mild keratoconus: A comparative study. clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:1435-1440.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Salman AG. Transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in a pediatric age group. J cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:1164-1170.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lim L, Wei RH, chan WK, Tan DT. Evaluation of higher order ocular aberrations in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2007;23:825-828.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Nakagawa T, Maeda N, Kosaki R, Hori Y, Saika M, Inoue T, et al. Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:2660-2665.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One year results. J cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:149-160.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Hafezi F, Mrochen M, Iseli HP, Seiler T. collagen crosslinking with ultraviolet-A and hypoosmolar ribo- flavin solution in thin corneas. J cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:621-624.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Grewal DS1, Brar GS, Jain R, Sood V, Singla M, Grewal SP. Corneal collagen crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light for keratoconus: One-year analysis using Scheimpflug imaging. J cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:425-432.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 2009;116:369-378.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Koller T, Iseli H, Hafezi F, Vinciguerra P, Seiler T. Scheimpflug imaging of corneas after collagen cross-linking. Cornea 2009;28:510-515.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Baumeister M, Klaproth OK, Gehmlich J, Buhren J, Kohnen T. changes in corneal first-surface wavefront aberration after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd 2009;226:752-756.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Pesudovs K, Schoneveld P, Seto RJ, coster DJ. contrast and glare testing in keratoconus and after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:653-657.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Zimmerman AB, Lust KL, Bullimore MA. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision. Eye contact Lens 2011;37:153-159.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, Tsubota K. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:924-629.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Okamoto c, Okamoto F, Samejima T, Miyata K, Oshika T. Higher-order wave front aberration and letter-contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:1488-1492.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. J cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1780-1785.  Back to cited text no. 45
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed784    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded116    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]