Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 144--150

Effect of monocular deprivation on rabbit neural retinal cell densities


Philip Maseghe Mwachaka, Hassan Saidi, Paul Ochieng Odula, Pamela Idenya Mandela 
 Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

Correspondence Address:
Philip Maseghe Mwachaka
Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, PO Box 30197, Nairobi
Kenya

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the effect of monocular deprivation on densities of neural retinal cells in rabbits. Methods: Thirty rabbits, comprised of 18 subject and 12 control animals, were included and monocular deprivation was achieved through unilateral lid suturing in all subject animals. The rabbits were observed for three weeks. At the end of each week, 6 experimental and 3 control animals were euthanized, their retinas was harvested and processed for light microscopy. Photomicrographs of the retina were taken and imported into FIJI software for analysis. Results: Neural retinal cell densities of deprived eyes were reduced along with increasing period of deprivation. The percentage of reductions were 60.9% (P < 0.001), 41.6% (P = 0.003), and 18.9% (P = 0.326) for ganglion, inner nuclear, and outer nuclear cells, respectively. In non-deprived eyes, cell densities in contrast were increased by 116% (P < 0.001), 52% (P < 0.001) and 59.6% (P < 0.001) in ganglion, inner nuclear, and outer nuclear cells, respectively. Conclusion: In this rabbit model, monocular deprivation resulted in activity-dependent changes in cell densities of the neural retina in favour of the non-deprived eye along with reduced cell densities in the deprived eye.



How to cite this article:
Mwachaka PM, Saidi H, Odula PO, Mandela PI. Effect of monocular deprivation on rabbit neural retinal cell densities.J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2015;10:144-150


How to cite this URL:
Mwachaka PM, Saidi H, Odula PO, Mandela PI. Effect of monocular deprivation on rabbit neural retinal cell densities. J Ophthalmic Vis Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 14 ];10:144-150
Available from: http://www.jovr.org/text.asp?2015/10/2/144/163770


Full Text



 Introduction



The retina plays a critical role in visual perception as it contains the initial components of the visual pathway.[1] The retina develops from outpouchings of the neural tube known as optic vesicles[2] and is morphologically made up of the outer retinal pigment epithelium and inner neural retina. The neural retina is the photosensitive layer and contains several cell types including photoreceptors (rods and cones), conducting neurons (bipolar and retinal ganglion cells), interneurons (horizontal and amacrine cells) and glial cells.[3] These cells are arranged in three histologically distinct 'nuclear' layers containing cell bodies but no synapses, separated by two 'plexiform' layers having synapses but no cell bodies.[3] Axons of ganglion cells form the optic nerve which synapse with third order neurons at the lateral geniculate body of the thalamus.[4] The third order neurons mainly project to the primary visual cortex where processing of the visual information takes place.[3]

Neuroplasticity is the ability of the nervous system to adapt its structural organization to new situations emerging from changes due to intrinsic or extrinsic inputs.[5],[6] Monocular eyelid closure using sutures results in anatomical changes in the visual cortex in favor of the non-deprived eye.[7],[8],[9] This phenomenon is referred to as ocular dominance plasticity. The changes include synaptic modifications, changes in cell densities of the cortex,[5],[6],[10] as well as spatial changes in gene expression in the primary visual cortex.[11],[12]

Structural changes occurring in the retina following monocular deprivation remain largely undescribed, despite the fact that the retina is considered as part of the nervous system based on its embryonic development from the diencephalon as well as its cellular content. The neural retina develops in an inside-to-outside manner; ganglion cells are formedfirst and photoreceptor cells are the last cells to become fully mature.[13] At birth, the retina and visual pathway are fully formed. Visual experience in the early postnatal period, as a critical period, is important for maturation of the visual system.[14] This period corresponds to the time in normal development during which geniculocortical axons attain their mature organization in the form of ocular dominance columns and is affected by monocular deprivation.[15] In rodents and cats, plasticity is low at eye opening, peaks around four weeks of age and declines over several weeks to months.[16] In human beings, the critical period appears to lie within thefirst 10 years of life.[17]

Rabbits offer an ideal model for vision research as they are readily available and easy to handle. Moreover, their visual capabilities and retinal cell types have been studied in detail and characterized in a fashion similar to those in humans.[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] The present study was aimed at describing the effect of monocular deprivation on densities of neural retinal cells in a rabbit model.

 Methods



Animals

Thirty Californian white rabbits (oryctolagus cuniculus) including 18 subject and 12 control animals were obtained from a local private commercial farm. Since the peak period for development of ocular dominance plasticity is between the 2nd and 4th postnatal week, the animals were recruited into the study on their 14th postnatal day. Rabbits with obvious congenital or acquired eye disorders were excluded. Approval to carry out the study was granted by the Biosafety, Animal Care and Use Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Handling of Study Animals

The rabbits were kept in wire cages measuring 4 feet by 4 feet, floored with sawdust. Each cage housed one doe and its litter with a nest box for the litter and was cleaned daily. Since a nursing female and its litter require a minimum floor space of 7.5 square feet (for a doe with more than 5 kg body weight) and one doe would have 6-12 kits per litter (average 8), then a 16 square feet cage would be spacious enough for each doe and its kits. The rabbits were fed on commercial rabbit pellets, half a cup of pellets per 5 kg of body weight daily and were offered water ad libitumthrough sipper bottles with nozzles.

Monocular Deprivation

Eighteen subject rabbits were recruited on their 14th post natal day and were divided into two groups of nine animals. One group had their right eyelids sutured together while the other group had their left eyelids stitched up. These animals were restrained for body weight estimation and administration of medications using a restrain box, then anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (50 mg/kg) and also given intramuscular analgesic (flunixin meglumine 1.1 mg/kg). Two drops of gentamycin eye drops were instilled into the eye to be deprived. The margins of the upper and lower lids of one eye were trimmed and sutured together using a single vertical mattress 5/0 nylon stitch under aseptic conditions.

Following tarsorrhaphy, the rabbits were returned to their home cages and observed daily for suture breakdown or infection. Post-operative pain was managed by intramuscular flunixin meglumine (1.1 mg/kg) every 24 hours for 4 days. In addition, the animals were clinically assessed for signs and symptoms of pain such as poor feeding, facing the back of the cage (hiding posture), vocalization by means of a piercing squeal, kicking and scratching, and teeth grinding. Rabbits, which continued to experience pain despite being on the regular analgesic, received a further dose of intramuscular butorphanol (0.5 mg/kg) 12 hourly until they were pain free.

Animals which developed suture dehiscence or infection were excluded from the study and treated accordingly. Those with suture infection received topical antibiotic eye drops (gentamycin) for five days while those with suture dehiscence were examined for any eye infection and treated with topical antibiotics.

Tissue Harvesting

Three control animals were sacrificed at the start of the study (14th postnatal day), the day on which the subject animals had also their eyelids sutured together. Thereafter nine rabbits including 3 controls and 6 experimental subjects were sacrificed each successive week, as shown in [Table 1]. Following weight determination, the rabbits were euthanized using intravenous Euthasol® (sodium pentobarbital 390 mg/ml + sodium phenytoin 50 mg/ml) at a dose of 1mL per 4.5 kg body weight (86.7 mg/kg pentobarbital and 11.1 mg/kg phenytoin). Once death was confirmed by loss of pupillary light reflex and corneal reflex, the thoracic cavity was opened then intracardiac prewash with saline was commenced, followed by perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde solution as described by Gage et al[24] and Cunningham and Scouten.[25] Following perfusion, both eyes were enucleated then bisected along the vertical meridian. This was followed by removal of the vitreous humor from the eyecup to facilitate further penetration of the fixating medium (paraformaldehyde). The retina was stored in the fixative for 48 hours. The carcasses were incinerated after the tissues were harvested.{Table 1}

Histological Analysis

The eyes were dehydrated in a series of graded alcohols and embedded in paraffin wax. A microtome was used to produce 5-µm thick sections, obtained from cuts through the whole globe, oriented along the optic nerve. Sections within the central retina were used for analysis. For each eye, four sections obtained through systematic sampling technique were picked and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H and E) stain.[26] Photomicrographs of the sections were taken using a Canon® digital camera (PowerShot A640 camera, 12 megapixels, Canon, Tokyo, Japan), then transferred to a computer installed with ImageJ-Fiji software[27] for morphometric and stereological analysis. Cell densities in the outer nuclear, inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers were determined by counting the number of cell bodies seen in the field and dividing this number with the field area. For each section, cell counting was done in four different areas and then averaged.

Statistical Analysis

Collected data was entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (Version 17.0, Chicago, Illinois, USA) for coding, tabulation and statistical analysis. After confirming that the data was normally distributed using histograms and box plots, parametric tests were used to compare the means of the variables measured. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the means of each variable studied from baseline to the end of the third week of the study. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences in means between non-deprived and deprived eyes, non-deprived andcontrol eyes, and deprived andcontrol eyes. P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.

 Results



Deprived Eyes

There was generalized reduction in retinal cell densities in deprived eyes along with increasing duration of monocular deprivation [Figure 1]. The percentages of reduction of cell densities from the baseline were 60.9%, 41.6%, and 18.9% for ganglion, inner nuclear and outer nuclear cells, respectively [Table 2]. Statistically significant reductions in cell densities were noted in the ganglion and inner nuclear cell layers (ANOVA test, P < 0.05).{Figure 1}{Table 2}

Non-deprived Eyes

Cell densities in non-deprived eyes were increased along with increasing duration of monocular deprivation of the fellow eye [Figure 2]. The percentage of increase in ganglion, inner nuclear and outer nuclear layer cells were 116%, 52% and 59.6%, respectively [Table 2]. All mentioned differences were statistically significant (ANOVA, P < 0.05).{Figure 2}

Control Eyes

The retinas of the control eyes did not display any statistically significant change in cell density during the period of the study [Table 2].

Deprived versus Non-deprived Eyes

Monocular deprivation resulted in an increase in cell populations of the non-deprived eyes while cell densities in the deprived eyes were reduced. The difference between the deprived and non-deprived eyes was more marked with increasing deprivation period [Figure 3] and [Table 3].{Figure 3}{Table 3}

Non-deprived versus Control Eyes

The non-deprived eyes had higher cell densities as compared to control eyes at all three study intervals [Figure 4] showing a statistically significant differences after two and three weeks of deprivation [Table 4]. At the end of the third week of deprivation, the non-deprived retinas, as compared to the control retinas, had 115.6%, 50.3%, and 56.6% increments in ganglion, inner nuclear, and outer nuclear cell densities, respectively. All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).{Figure 4}{Table 4}

Deprived versus Control Eyes

The deprived eyes had lower cell densities as compared to the control eyes, with differences being more marked while the period of deprivation increased [Figure 5]. There were more noticeable changes in the ganglion cell densities [Table 5]. As compared to the controls, cell densities of ganglion cells in the deprived eyes was reduced by 32%, 39%, and 54% after one, two and three weeks of monocular deprivation, respectively.{Figure 5}{Table 5}

 Discussion



Neuroplasticity is the ability of the nervous system to adapt its structural organization to new situations emerging from changes due to intrinsic or extrinsic inputs.[5],[6] The present study has revealed that monocular deprivation leads to significant reduction in neural retinal cell densities of deprived eyes with a compensatory increase in non-deprived eyes. This is in agreement with previous studies on tree shrews.[28] Similar findings have been reported in other stimulus deprived receptor organs such as the olfactory mucosa after unilateral naris occlusion,[29],[30] and the organ of Corti after unilateral hearing loss.[31],[32] These findings have been attributed to under-expression of pro-mitotic genes and increased expression of apoptotic genes on the deprived side leading to reduced cellular proliferation.[33],[34] In the retina, growth factors such as brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been shown to affect cellular proliferation.[35],[36] In monocularly deprived eyes, BDNF expression is reduced in deprived eyes and increased in non-deprived eyes.[35] In the current study, the reduction in cell densities in deprived eyes could be as a result of reduced expression of promitotic factors such as BDNF or increased expression of apoptotic factors.

Although all cells demonstrated changes in their densities with monocular deprivation, the most marked changes were displayed in ganglion cells. Among the non-deprived eyes, ganglion cell density increased by 116% as compared to baseline (P < 0.001), while in deprived eyes, it was reduced by 60.9% (P < 0.001). Retinal ganglion cells are significant in the visual pathway as they are the output neurons from the retina.[37],[1],[3] Previous studies on the effects of monocular deprivation on retinal ganglion cell densities provide contradictory reports. Studies on the Rhesus monkeys[38] and rats[39] have reported a decrease in ganglion cell density in deprived eyes, while a study on three cats raised with monocular deprivation for 5.2-7.2 years did not reveal any differences in ganglion cell densities.[40] The findings by the latter study could be due to small sample size used, species of animal used or duration of deprivation.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that monocular deprivation results in activity-dependent changes in the neural retina and a reduction in all cell densities in deprived eyes with compensatory changes in the non-deprived eyes. These changes in the retina may contribute to changes seen in the visual cortex in monocularly deprived animals. However, further studies seem to be required to determine whether these changes in the retina are reversible, and if so, the maximum period of deprivation beyond which these changes cannot be reversed.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Masland RH. Cell populations of the retina: The proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4581-4591.
2Moore KL, Persaud TV, Torchia MG. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013.
3Masland RH. The neuronal organization of the retina. Neuron 2012;76:266-280.
4Kolb H, Fernandez E, Nelson R. Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. Salt Lake City (UT): University of Utah Health Sciences Center; 1995. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11530/.
5Antonini A, Stryker MP. Rapid remodeling of axonal arbors in the visual cortex. Science 1993;260:1819-1821.
6Antonini A, Fagiolini M, Stryker MP. Anatomical correlates of functional plasticity in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 1999;19:4388-4406.
7Cang J, Kalatsky VA, Löwel S, Stryker MP. Optical imaging of the intrinsic signal as a measure of cortical plasticity in the mouse. Vis Neurosci 2005;22:685-691.
8Hofer SB, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Prior experience enhances plasticity in adult visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2006;9:127-132.
9Lehmann K, Löwel S. Age-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult mice. PLoS One 2008;3:e3120.
10Trachtenberg JT, Stryker MP. Rapid anatomical plasticity of horizontal connections in the developing visual cortex. J Neurosci 2001;21:3476-3482.
11Nakagami Y, Watakabe A, Yamamori T. Monocular inhibition reveals temporal and spatial changes in gene expression in the primary visual cortex of marmoset. Front Neural Circuits 2013;7:43.
12Nakadate K, Imamura K, Watanabe Y. Effects of monocular deprivation on the spatial pattern of visually induced expression of c-Fos protein. Neuroscience 2012;202:17-28.
13Agathocleous M, Harris WA. From progenitors to differentiated cells in the vertebrate retina. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009;25:45-69.
14Sengpiel F, Kind PC. The role of activity in development of the visual system. Curr Biol 2002;12:R818-826.
15Huberman AD, Feller MB, Chapman B. Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008;31:479-509.
16Levelt CN, Hübener M. Critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012;35:309-330.
17Lewis TL, Maurer D. Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: Evidence from visually deprived children. Dev Psychobiol 2005;46:163-183.
18Amthor FR, Takahashi ES, Oyster CW. Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with complex receptive fields. J Comp Neurol 1989;280:97-121.
19Amthor FR, Takahashi ES, Oyster CW. Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with complex receptive fields. J Comp Neurol 1989;280:97-121.
20Strettoi E, Dacheux RF, Raviola E. Cone bipolar cells as interneurons in the rod pathway of the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 1994;347:139-149.
21McGillem GS, Dacheux RF. Rabbit cone bipolar cells: Correlation of their morphologies with whole-cell recordings. Vis Neurosci 2001;18:675-685.
22MacNeil MA, Heussy JK, Dacheux RF, Raviola E, Masland RH. The population of bipolar cells in the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 2004;472:73-86.
23Muraoka Y, Ikeda HO, Nakano N, Hangai M, Toda Y, Okamoto-Furuta K, et al. Real-time imaging of rabbit retina with retinal degeneration by using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2012;7:e36135.
24Gage GJ, Kipke DR, Shain W. Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents. J Vis Exp 2012;65: e3564.
25Cunningham M, Scouten CW. Sacrifice Perfusion in Animal Research; 2012. Available from: http://www.leicabiosystems.com/pathologyleaders/sacrifice-perfusion-in-animal-research/. [Last accessed on 2014 May 17].
26Rolls G. Performing a Hematoxylin and Eosin Stain – A Step by Step Guide; 2012. Available from: http://www.leicabiosystems.com /pathologyleaders /performing-a-hematoxylin-and-eosin-stain -a-step-by-step-guide/. [Last accessed on 2014 May 17].
27Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:676-682.
28Abbott CJ, Grünert U, Pianta MJ, McBrien NA. Retinal thinning in tree shrews with induced high myopia: Optical coherence tomography and histological assessment. Vision Res 2011;51:376-385.
29Coppola DM. Studies of olfactory system neural plasticity: The contribution of the unilateral naris occlusion technique. Neural Plast 2012;2012:351752.
30Huart C, Rombaux P, Hummel T. Plasticity of the human olfactory system: The olfactory bulb. Molecules 2013;18:11586-11600.
31Terayama Y, Kaneko Y, Kawamoto K, Sakai N. Ultrastructural changes of the nerve elements following disruption of the organ of Corti. I. Nerve elements in the organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;83:291-302.
32Syka J. Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss, restoration of function, and during learning. Physiol Rev 2002;82:601-636.
33Firszt JB, Reeder RM, Holden TA, Burton H, Chole RA. Changes in auditory perceptions and cortex resulting from hearing recovery after extended congenital unilateral hearing loss. Front Syst Neurosci 2013;7:108.
34Zhao S, Tian H, Ma L, Yuan Y, Yu CR, Ma M. Activity-dependent modulation of odorant receptor gene expression in the mouse olfactory epithelium. PLoS One 2013;8:e69862.
35Seki M, Nawa H, Fukuchi T, Abe H, Takei N. BDNF is upregulated by postnatal development and visual experience: Quantitative and immunohistochemical analyses of BDNF in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3211-3218.
36Mandolesi G, Menna E, Harauzov A, von Bartheld CS, Caleo M, Maffei L. A role for retinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor in ocular dominance plasticity. Curr Biol 2005;15:2119-2124.
37Berson DM. Retinal Ganglion Cell Types and Their Central Projections. In: Masland RH, Albright TD, Dallos P, Oertel D, Firestein S, Beauchamp GK, et al.The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. New York: Academic Press; 2008. p.491–519. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123708809002802. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 11].
38Von Noorden GK, Crawford ML, Middleditch PR. Effect of lid suture on retinal ganglion cells in Macaca mulatta. Brain Res 1977;122:437-444.
39Hsiao CF, Fukuda Y. Plastic changes in the distribution and soma size of retinal ganglion cells after neonatal monocular enucleation in rats. Brain Res 1984;301:1-12.
40Spear PD, Hou V. Retinal ganglion-cell densities and soma sizes are unaffected by long-term monocular deprivation in the cat. Brain Res 1990;522:354-358.